Best Open Source CRMs for 2025

François Zaninotto
François ZaninottoFebruary 03, 2025
#oss

Need a CRM that fits your business—not the other way around? We tested the top open-source options of 2025 to find the most customizable, developer-friendly solutions.

Why Use An Open-Source CRM?

If you’re looking for open-source CRM software, you’re probably in one of these situations:

  1. You’re running a small business, and you need a of CRM to manage your customer relationships, but you want the tool to adapt to your business and not the other way around. You have some basic technical skills, and you’re not afraid to get your hands dirty.
  2. You're already a user of commercial CRM software, and you’re looking for a more flexible and cost-effective solution. You're ready to invest some time and money to migrate your data and adapt the software to your needs.
  3. You're not a coder, and you're only looking for a free CRM.

This benchmark is for you if you're in the first two situations, as it focuses on the ability to modify the software using code beyond what the user interface allows.

Selecting Open-Source CRMs

We selected open-source projects that encourage and support modifying their code. The choice is surprisingly limited, as most editors use the word "open source" as a synonym for "free tier" but don't really want you to modify their code.

  • Target Audience: Small to Medium Businesses: Large corporate companies have very specific needs and can afford to pay for a commercial CRM. We focused on CRMs suitable for small to medium businesses.
  • Really Open-Source: We only considered CRMs that provide an easy-to-find repository for their source code. The repository must be active, with a reasonable number of contributors, a regular release cycle, and a short time to fix security issues.
  • Developer Documentation: Only projects that provide clear and up-to-date documentation were considered.
  • Active Community: Some projects are developed in-house, in a closed environment, and the source code is only published as a second thought. We only considered projects with an active repository, a public bug tracker accepting external contributions, and a public roadmap.
  • Easy Start: A full-stack developer should be able to download and launch the CRM in less than 30 minutes. We only considered projects that provide a simple way to start the CRM locally.
  • Easy Hosting: Some open-source frameworks are notably hard to host (I'm looking at you, Next.js). We only considered projects that can be hosted in any Linux host with a few commands.
  • English Interface: Many CRM projects are only available in French, Polish, or Russian. We only considered projects that are available for an international audience and support at least English and, ideally, other languages.
  • Minimal Features: We only considered projects that cover at least the basic CRM features: contacts, companies, deals, notes, file attachments, and import/export. We didn't consider projects that are too specialized (for example, only for real estate or non-profits).

Based on these criteria, we selected the following open-source CRMs for evaluation, which we list in order of preference:

  1. Twenty
  2. Atomic CRM
  3. EspoCRM
  4. OroCRM
  5. SuiteCRM
  6. Odoo
  7. ERPNext
  8. Axelor

Disclaimer: We're the editors of Atomic CRM, one of the CRMs mentioned in this benchmark. We tried to be as objective as possible, but we're not neutral. We're also not affiliated with any other projects mentioned in this benchmark.


Twenty

Twenty CRM Twenty CRM Twenty CRM
Plus Easy to installMinus No mobile app
Plus HackableMinus Huge codebase
Plus Developer documentationMinus Contaminant license
Plus Active communityMinus No multi-tenancy
Plus Code quality

Twenty's popularity is growing, and for good reasons: they move fast and clearly identify developers as key users. The codebase is clean and well-documented, although quite big for the feature set. The project is still young but is already a solid choice for a small to medium business. Too bad they're using a contaminant license!

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Custom fields and objects via GUI
  • Email sync (Google)
  • Calendar sync (Google)
  • GraphQL and REST API
  • Webhooks
  • Global search, not super effective
  • Favorites in the sidebar
  • Soft delete
  • Bulk actions
  • User management
  • Integrations with Zapier
  • Custom time format and timezone support
  • List UI is bland
  • Onboarding is not great
  • Dashboard
  • Tags
  • Charts
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Hosting (docker-compose, terraform, upgrade guide)
  • Storybook for developing in isolation
  • Active repository, many active contributors
  • Themeability via styled components
  • SPA architecture (Vite)
  • Installation (git clone, manual PostgreSQL setup, manual Redis setup)
  • Impersonation
  • Monorepo
  • Some unit tests
  • Huge codebase
  • Custom Design System and UI library
  • Custom Frontend application framework
  • No component tests
  • Complex server code to build the API
  • No package to use, git clone only

Atomic CRM

Atomic CRM Atomic CRM Atomic CRM
Plus Lightweight codebaseMinus Limited built-in features (just the basics)
Plus Highly flexible data modelMinus Custom fields require coding
Plus Developer-first designMinus Small Community
Plus Truly Open-Source
Plus Automated deployment

Atomic CRM leverages modern technologies to minimize the code required to build a CMS (only 15k LOC for a complete solution). As a consequence, it's easy to learn and easy to customize. See it as a perfect template to build your own CRM rather than a full-featured CRM that you'll spend months to adapt to your needs.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Great user experience
  • Model studio (powered by Supabase)
  • Inbound email support
  • Auto-generated avatars
  • Kanban-style pipeline board
  • Activity dashboard
  • Advanced search & filtering
  • Multi-user support
  • Optimized for performance
  • No Email or calendar sync
  • Basic onboarding process
  • Limited user documentation
  • Mobile UI could be improved
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Unlimited customization
  • Extensible data model (powered by Supabase)
  • Rich component library (powered by react-admin)
  • Lightweight: Only 15k LOC!
  • Third-party authentication support
  • Full-featured API
  • Modern tech stack
  • Modular component-based architecture
  • Simple installation & hosting
  • Bring Your Own Authentication
  • Fully themeable UI
  • Strongly typed codebase
  • No built-in third-party connectors
  • Small community

EspoCRM

EspoCRM EspoCRM EspoCRM
Plus Large CRM feature setMinus Code complexity
Plus Intuitive interfaceMinus Contaminant license
Plus Built-in administrationMinus Documentation

EspoCRM is a very complete CRM with a simple user interface. The powerful in-app administration allows you to customize pretty much everything. If its features match your needs, it's a great choice. However, the codebase is quite large, uses homemade backend and frontend frameworks, and the documentation is limited, so even simple code customizations can be challenging.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Simple UI
  • Model studio
  • Roles manager
  • Powerful administration
  • Beyond CRM: cases, knowledge base, marketing campaigns
  • Complete API
  • Audit log
  • Customizable dashboard
  • Email sync
  • Analytics
  • OIDC, LDAP
  • Complex filtering UX
  • No built-in integrations
  • Limited user documentation
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Active support
  • Regular updates
  • SPA architecture
  • Backend extension via hooks
  • Fine-grained access control
  • Contaminant license
  • Limited developer documentation
  • Home-made backend framework & ORM (Espo)
  • Home-made frontend framework based on Handlebars
  • Low test coverage
  • One-man project (yurikuzn)

OroCRM

Oro CRM Oro CRM Oro CRM
Plus Great documentationMinus Mobile support
Plus Clean codeMinus Contaminant license
Plus Email syncMinus Code complexity
Plus Integration capabilitiesMinus Outdated frontend stack
Minus Clunky UI

OroCRM is part of OroCommerce, a B2B eCommerce platform. While it includes basic CRM features, the primary focus is on eCommerce. Despite using modern coding practices, the extensive and complex codebase makes customization challenging, especially for basic CRM features.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Great user documentation
  • Automated actions (processes)
  • Email Sync
  • Custom fields via Entity Manager
  • Complete API
  • Sidebar Widgets
  • Customizable Dashboards
  • Marketing Campaigns
  • Customer Hierarchy
  • Integrations (ZenDesk, MailChimp, etc.)
  • LDAP integration
  • Embedded Forms
  • No mobile app
  • UI isn't very intuitive
  • Complex initial setup
  • Steep learning curve
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Built on Symfony Framework
  • Modular
  • Strong test coverage
  • Comprehensive developer documentation
  • Contaminant license
  • Uses a custom framework (1.3M LOC)
  • Overengineered
  • Frequent breaking changes
  • Outdated JS and CSS stack
  • Resource intensive

SuiteCRM

Suite CRM Suite CRM Suite CRM
Plus Feature-richMinus Outdated codebase
Plus CustomizableMinus Contaminant license
Plus Developer documentationMinus Outdated UI
Plus Integration capabilitiesMinus Performance
Plus Active communityMinus Mobile support

SuiteCRM is the successor of the popular SugarCRM, open-source until 2014. Its legacy is both a chance and a burden: it has a large user base and many features, but the codebase is old and uses outdated coding practices. It is probably not the best candidate for a simple CRM.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Workflow automation
  • Modularity
  • Integrations
  • Reporting Tools
  • Security Suite (Groups)
  • Customization framework
  • Community
  • Mostly CRUD
  • Poor User experience
  • Dated Design
  • Limited REST API
  • Clunky Reports & Charts
  • Subpar Mobile UI
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Developer Documentation
  • Rich plugin Ecosystem
  • Self-Hosting Flexibility
  • Logic Hooks
  • Extension Framework
  • Technical Debt
  • Home-made MVC Framework
  • jQuery
  • Outdated Coding Practices
  • Performance Optimization Challenges
  • Huge Codebase

Odoo

Odoo CRM Odoo CRM Odoo CRM
  • Overall rating:   4/10
  • Tech stack: Python, OWL JS Framework (in-house), XML templates, PostgreSQL, TypeScript
  • License: LGPLv3 (not contaminant for dynamic linking)
  • Website: https://odoo.com/
  • Repository: https://github.com/odoo/odoo
Plus Large feature setMinus Too large!
Plus Modular architectureMinus Steep learning curve
Plus Developer documentationMinus Implementation complexity
Plus ScalableMinus Performance
Plus Active community

Odoo is a behemoth CRM that covers pretty much every feature you can think of. It's also an ERP, with modules covering finance, supply chain, point of sale, human resources, marketing, and even a website builder! The main consequence is that the codebase is huge. Most Odoo projects are carried out by specialized Odoo developers who make a career out of it. It's a good fit for large companies that need an integrated solution but not for small businesses.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Customizable workflows
  • Mobile app
  • Integrations (auth & data)
  • App marketplace
  • Multi-channel (email, social media, voip, etc.)
  • Full-featured
  • Really customizable
  • Reporting and analytics
  • Community support
  • Onboarding
  • Superficial user documentation
  • Not always intuitive
  • Navigation UX
  • Upgrading challenges
  • Advanced Security
  • Centered around accounting
  • Limited free edition
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Developer documentation
  • Modular architecture
  • Scalable
  • Active Community
  • Developer mode
  • Rich module library
  • Easy hosting
  • In-house frontend and backend frameworks
  • Huge codebase
  • Variable code quality
  • Performance woes
  • Upgrades are hard

ERPNext

ERPNext ERPNext ERPNext
Plus Large feature setMinus Too large!
Plus Video tutorialsMinus Steep learning curve
Plus Developer documentationMinus Implementation complexity

ERPNext is designed to be the central hub for all your business needs, from CRM to accounting, inventory, project management, and more. But if you're only looking for a CRM, it's way too complex, and the workflow is too rigid. Finally, it's not easy to dive in and start customizing the code.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Integrated platform
  • Full featured
  • User documentation
  • Customization capabilities
  • Comprehensive reporting
  • No mobile UI
  • Performance issues
  • Limited advanced CRM features
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Developer documentation
  • Modular architecture
  • Active community support
  • Contaminant license
  • Too complex
  • Home-made MVC Framework (Frappe)
  • Limited third-party integrations

Axelor

Axelor Axelor Axelor
Plus Comprehensive ERP featuresMinus Contaminant license
Plus Extensive APIMinus Not developer-friendly
Minus Poor user experience

Axelor is another ERP / BMP low-code platform with a CRM module. Even though it's open-source, it's not really designed for developers to modify the code. The codebase is enormous, and the documentation is limited. It's a good fit for companies that need a lot of features and are ready to pay for the enterprise version.

Features
LoveLikeRegret
  • Integrated BPM
  • Full-featured ERP (commerce, HR, finance, supply chain)
  • Comprehensive API support
  • Good user documentation
  • Model studio
  • User experience is not great
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited official extensions
  • Upgrade challenges
Developer Experience
LoveLikeRegret
  • Uses Hibernate ORM
  • Regular updates
  • Developer documentation is limited
  • Complex initial setup
  • Home-made backend framework
  • Contaminant license
  • React templates (not components)
  • Performance with large datasets
  • Limited third-party integrations

Honorable mentions

The following CRMs didn't make the cut but are worth mentioning:

  • vtiger (SaaS with source available, no developer docs)
  • Dolibarr (not completely English, outdated code base)
  • CiviCRM (only for associations and non-profits)
  • Yetiforce (source code is not available)
  • SugarCRM (not open-source since 2014)
  • Commercial CRMs with a free tier (Hubspot, Monday, Zoho, Salesforce, etc.)

Conclusion

None of the open-source CRMs we tested achieved a 10/10. You'll have to make compromises.

This benchmark shows that there are very few open-source CMS that a company can modify without publishing its changes (Atomic CRM and Odoo). Most open-source CRMs rely on a huge codebase, which makes them hard to customize. In addition, many of them rely on non-standard frameworks, so finding developers and training them will be a challenge.

But there is hope! The top three CRMs in this benchmark (Twenty, Atomic CRM, and EspoCRM) are good choices for a small to medium business. If you're looking for a CRM that you can modify to fit your business, you should start with one of these three.

Did you like this article? Share it!